PECULIARITIES OF URGENT ADAPTATION OF MARINE SPECIALISTS OF CONSTRUCTION AND ACTIVE SHIPS AT MARINE OUTPUTS

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

At present, the number of ships under construction, repairing and upgrading, has increased and, accordingly, their marine outputs, which occur when there is an increased number of participants on board, which significantly impairs the habitability of the ship. In such cases, the dynamics of adaptation reactions of sailors to the conditions of navigation may differ from that on active ships and to a greater extent depend on the initial adaptation potential of the organism. This provision was the main hypothesis of the study performed. The purpose of the work is a comparative assessment of urgent adaptation of marine specialists of construction and active ships at marine outputs. Materials and methods. The control groups of 2 crews under construction ships (19 people) and 4 crews of active ships (36 people) were examined using a specially developed complex of clinical, physiological and psycho-physiological methods. The groups of seamen were divided into subgroups depending on the initial adaptation potential of the organism. Studies were conducted — in the pre-shipping period (1st stage); twice during the period of sailing — after 7 days from the moment of going to sea (2nd stage) and 3 days before the end of the voyage (3rd stage); and 4–6 days after returning to the base (4th stage). The results of research have shown the process of urgent adaptation among sailors of ships under construction, when going out to sea, is much more stressful and difficult than a similar process in the crews of operating ships. In addition, difficulties in adapting to the conditions of navigation are largely determined by the level of the initial adaptation potential of the organism, which can serve as a prognostic criterion for unacceptable deterioration in the working capacity of marine specialists. In this regard, it is extremely important not only to revise the existing labor regimes of the crews of ships under construction, repair and upgrade, but also to improve the measures of their medical (including physiological and psychophysiological) support.

About the authors

Aleksej T. Tyagnerev

The Department (of state acceptance of ships)

Author for correspondence.
Email: tyagner87@mail.ru
St. Petersburg Russian Federation

Andrej O. Ivanov

Research Institute of Rescue and Underwater Technologies of the MTSC of the Navy «Naval Academy named after Admiral of the Fleet N. G. Kuznetsov»

Email: ivanoff65@mail.ru
St. Petersburg Russian Federation

Sergej M. Groshilin

Rostov State Medical University

Email: sgroshilin@rambler.ru
Rostov-on-Don Russian Federation

Dmitrij V. Shatov

Rostov State Medical University

Email: shatovdv@mail.ru
Rostov-on-Don Russian Federation

Oksana V. Lobozova

Stavropol State Medical University

Email: oloboz26@gmail.com
Stavropol Russian Federation

Sergej N. Linchenko

Kuban State Medical University

Email: s_linchenko@mail.ru
Krasnodar Russian Federation

Sergej G. Afendikov

Rostov State Medical University

Email: sgroshilin@rambler.ru
Rostov-on-Don Russian Federation

References

  1. Мосягин И.Г., Бойко И.М., Пуляев М.Н. Система медицинского обеспечения морской авиации Военно-Морского Флота: проблемные вопросы и пути их решения // Морская медицина. 2018. Т. 3, № 4. С. 7–17. doi: 10.22328/2413-5747-2018-4-4-7-17.
  2. Ковалев А.С., Герегей А.М., Малахова И.С., Бондарчук Е.В. Возможности оценки функционального состояния организма плавсостава с использованием трехступенчатого теста и эргоспирометрии // Материалы IV Всерос. науч.- практ. конф., посв. 50-летию ФГУП НИИ ПММ ФМБА (г. Санкт-Петербург, 28–29 июня 2017 года). СПб.: ООО «Сборка», 2017. С. 100–101.
  3. Ломов О.П., Ахметзянов И.М., Соколов М.О. Физические факторы обитаемости кораблей и судов. СПб.: Судостроение, 2014. 560 с.
  4. Линченко С.Н., Иванов А.О., Степанов В.А., Барачевский Ю.Е., Бугаян С.Э., Кочубейник Н.В., Грошилин С.М. Восстановление и расширение функционального потенциала организма человека посредством аэрокриотермических тренировок // Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. 2017. Т. 24, № 6. С. 95–101. doi: 10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-6-95-101.
  5. Кривощеков С.Г., Леутин В.П., Диверт В.Э. Системные механизмы адаптации и компенсации // Бюл. СО РАМН. 2004. № 2. С. 148–153.
  6. Мосягин И.Г., Лобозова О.В., Иванов А.О., Анистратенко Л.Г., Безкишкий Э.Н. Оптимизация психофизиологической адаптации студентов и курсантов в начальный период обучения с использованием криотермических тренировок // Военно-медицинский журнал. 2015. № 8. С. 68–70.
  7. Habib K.E., Gold P.W., Chrousos G.P. Neuroendocrinology of street // Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinic of North America. 2001. Vol. 30, Iss. 3. P. 695–728.
  8. Natelson B.N. Stress, hormones and disease // Physiol Behav. 2004. Vol. 82, Iss.1. P. 139–143.
  9. Нефедов В.П., Ясайтис А.А., Новосельцев В.Н. Гомеостаз на различных уровнях организации биосистем. Новосибирск: Наука, Сиб. отд., 1991. 232 с.
  10. Билый А.М., Васильков А.М. Психофизиологические предикторы интеграции человека и системы на современных кораблях ВМФ России // Морская медицина. 2018. Т. 4, № 3. С. 64–74. doi: 10.22328/2413-5747–2018-4-3-64-74.
  11. Иванов А.О., Тягнерев А.Т., Безкишкий Э.Н., Иодис А.А. Особенности функционального состояния и работоспособности экипажей строящихся кораблей на этапе выходов в море // Морская медицина. 2017. Т. 3, № 3. С. 70–77. doi: 10.22328/2413-5747-2017-3-3-70-77.
  12. Бодров В.А. Информационный стресс. М.: ПЕР СЭ, 2000. 352 с.
  13. Бодров В.А., Орлов В.Я. Психология и надежность: человек в системах управления техникой. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 1998. 288 с.
  14. Сапов И.А., Солодков А.С. Состояние функций организма и работоспособность моряков. Л.: Медицина, 1977. 192 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies