Decision-making style and emotional creativity in young people who have had COVID-19 infection
- Authors: Ulyukin I.M.1, Rassokhin V.V.2,3,4, Sechin A.A.1, Orlova E.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kirov Military Medical Academy
- Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
- Institute of Experimental Medicine RAS, St. Petersburg
- St. Petersburg Pasteur Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
- Issue: Vol 8, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 63-71
- Section: PHYSIOLOGY AND PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HUMAN PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY
- Submitted: 21.02.2023
- Accepted: 21.02.2023
- Published: 21.02.2023
- URL: https://seamed.bmoc-spb.ru/jour/article/view/599
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2022-8-4-63-71
- ID: 599
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The period of the current COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a prolonged situation of uncertainty; in the preference of styles and strategies for overcoming the intellectual and personal potential of a person is presented in the unity of the processes of cognitive evaluation, experience and choice of ways to solve a problem (stressful) situation.
OBJECTIVE: To study the interrelationships of decision-making style as a reflection of individual differences in coping with uncertainty and emotional creativity as a factor of self-realization in young people who have had COVID19 infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 100 convalescents aged 18.2±2.25 years, including 50 men (Group M) and 50 women (Group G) (the age difference between the groups is not significant). The main transferred clinical forms of COVID-19 infection were the inapparent form — 42.0% (group M — 32 people, group G — 10 people), acute respiratory viral infection — 56.0% (group M — 17 people, group G — 39 people) according to the Russian versions of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) and the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI).
RESULTS: In both groups of examined individuals after COVID-19 infection with all clinical forms of the disease, the strategy of «vigilance», considered as productive, is of the greatest importance in the decision-making process; unproductive strategies are not expressed, which is important for the subsequent medical and psychological support of convalescents.
DISCUSSION: In both groups of examined individuals after suffering COVID-19 infection in all clinical forms of the disease, the «vigilance» strategy, considered as productive, is of the greatest importance in the decision-making process; unproductive strategies are not expressed, which is important for the subsequent medical and psychological support of convalescents. It is noted that the interaction between the factors of emotional creativity is expressed not only in an increase in creativity when high values coincide on two or more faces, but also in the fact that low values of one component can be compensated by high values of another.
CONCLUSION: It is noted that the interaction between the factors of emotional creativity is expressed not only in an increase in creativity when high values coincide on two or more sides, but also in the fact that low values of one component can be compensated by high values of the other.
About the authors
I. M. Ulyukin
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8911-4458
SPIN-code: 7606-1700
Igor M. Ulyukin — Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher at the Research Center
194044, St. Petersburg, Akademika Lebedeva str., 6
Russian FederationV. V. Rassokhin
Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University; Institute of Experimental Medicine RAS, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg Pasteur Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1159-0101
SPIN-code: 3390-9457
Vadim V. Rassokhin — Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Socially Significant Infections and Phthisiopulmonology; Head of the Laboratory of Chronic Viral Infections of the Department of Environmental Physiology; Leading researcher
197022, St. Petersburg, Leo Tolstoy str., 6–8; 197376, St. Petersburg, Academician Pavlov str., 12; 197101, St. Petersburg, Mira str., 14
Russian FederationA. A. Sechin
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6832-6988
SPIN-code: 5002-8222
Alexey A. Sechin — Head of the Research Laboratory of the Research Center
194044, St. Petersburg, Akademika Lebedeva str., 6
Russian FederationE. S. Orlova
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1586-6635
SPIN-code: 9424-9235
Elena S. Orlova — Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher at the Research Center
194044, St. Petersburg, Akademika Lebedeva str., 6
Russian Federation
References
- Helms J., Kremer S., Merdji H., Clere-Jehl R., Schenck M., Kummerlen C., Collange O., Boulay C., Fafi-Kremer S., Ohana M., Anheim M., Meziani F. Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection // N. Engl. J. Med. 2020. Vol. 382, No. 23. P. 2268–2270. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2008597.
- Chen G., Wu D., Guo W., Cao Y., Huang D., Wang H., Wang T., Zhang X., Chen H., Yu H., Zhang X., Zhang M., Wu S., Song J., Chen T., Han M., Li S., Luo X., Zhao J., Ning Q. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019 // J. Clin. Invest. 2020. Vol. 130, No. 5. P. 2620–2629. doi: 10.1172/JCI137244.
- Carr E. COVID-19 Pandemic: What Have We Learned? // Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2021. Vol. 25, No. 1. P. 11–12. doi: 10.1188/21.CJON.11-12.
- Torjesen I. Covid-19: Omicron may be more transmissible than other variants and partly resistant to existing vaccines, scientists fear // BMJ. 2021. Vol. 375. n2943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2943.
- Bateman E.A., Viana R. Burnout among specialists and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A systematic review // J. Rehabil. Med. 2019. Vol. 51, No. 11. P. 869–874. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2614.
- Ходкинсон Д.П., Сперроу П.Р. Компетентная организация: психологический анализ процесса стратегического менеджмента. Xарьков: Гуманитарный центр, 2007. 392 c.
- Averill J.R. Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates // J. of personality. 1999. Vol. 67, No. 2. Р. 331–371. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00058.
- Averill J.R. Intelligence, emotion, and creativity: From trichotomy to trinity // Handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace / еds. R. Bar-On, J.D.A. Parke. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000. P. 363–376.
- Валуева Е.А. Диагностика эмоциональной креативности: адаптация опросника Дж. Эверилла // Социальный и эмоциональный интеллект: от процессов к измерениям / под ред. Д. В. Люсина, Д. В. Ушакова. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2009. C. 216–227
- Andiliou A., Murphy K.P. Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research // Educational Research Review. 2010. Vol. 5. P. 201–219. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003.
- Ivcevic Z., Mayer J.D. Mapping Dimensions of Creativity in the Life-Space // Creativity Research J. 2009. Vol. 21, No. 2–3. P. 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410902855259.
- Allard E.S., Kensinger E.A. Age-related differences in functional connectivity during cognitive emotion regulation // J. of Gerontology. Series B «Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences». 2014. Vol. 69, No. 6. P. 852–860. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu108.
- Корнилова Т.В., Шестова М.А., Павлова Е.М. Эмоциональная креативность в системе связей с имплицитными теориями и личностной сферой // Психологический журнал. 2020. Т. 41, № 4. С. 19–31. doi: 10.31857/S020595920010388-2.
- Павлова Е.М. Имплицитные теории и самооценка креативности в структуре самосознания личности // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. Т. 11, № 4. С. 75–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2014-4-75-94.
- Dominguez-Péry C., Vuddaraju L.N.R., Corbett-Etchevers I., Tassabehji R. Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: a bibliometric review and research agenda // J. Shipp. Trd. 2021. Vol. 6, No. 1. P. 20. doi: 10.1186/s41072-021-00098-y.
- Временные методические рекомендации «Профилактика, диагностика и лечение новой коронавирусной инфекции (COVID-19)». Версия 15 (22.02.2022). М.: МЗ РФ, 2022. 245 с.
- Mann L., Burnett P., Radford M., Ford S. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire: An Instrument of Measuring Patterns for Coping with Decisional Conflict // J. of Behavioral Decision Making. 1997. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:13.0.CO;2-X.
- Корнилова Т.В. Мельбурнский опросник принятия решений: русскоязычная адаптация // Психологические исследования. 2013. Т. 6, № 31. doi: https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i31.671.
- Совет Европы: Конвенция о защите личности в связи с автоматической обработкой персональных данных. 2-е изд., доп. СПб.: Гражданский контроль, 2002. 36 с.
- Юнкеров В.И., Григорьев С.Г., Резванцев М.В. Математико-статистическая обработка данных медицинских исследований. СПб.: ВМА, 2011. 318 с.
- Андреева И.Н. Эмоциональный интеллект и эмоциональная креативность: специфика и взаимодействие. Новополоцк: Полоцкий государственный университет, 2020. 356 с.
- Улюкин И.М., Киселева Н.В., Рассохин В.В., Орлова Е.С., Сечин А.А. Психосоматические нарушения (дистресс, депрессия, тревога, соматизация) у лиц молодого возраста, перенесших COVID-19 // Медицинский академический журнал. 2021. Т. 21, № 3. С. 63–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.17816/MAJ79127